Thursday, May 6, 2021
Home Politics Social, political leaders slam Nadda’s statements on CAA implementation

Social, political leaders slam Nadda’s statements on CAA implementation

India Tomorrow

NEW DELHI—Various social and political leaders have slammed BJP chief J P Nadda’s statements that Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) will be implemented. Nadda, addressing BJP workers in West Bengal on Monday, said that the CAA implementation was delayed due to coronavirus pandemic. With situation improving in the country, he said that work on framing rules on CAA had begun and it would finally be implemented.

Speaking to India Tomorrow, Welfare Party of India (WPI) president Dr. SQR Ilyas said, “As the CAA is discriminatory, illegal and unconstitutional, it was opposed through a mass protest by people from all communities from Punjab to Kerala and from Assam to Gujarat when the law was brought in December last year”.

“Though several groups have challenged the CAA in the Supreme Court and the latter has yet not conducted any hearing on it, people will certainly oppose it if the government goes ahead with implementing the controversial law”, he said.

WPI chief said that that the statements by Nadda seemed to be intended at polarizing the voters in ongoing Bihar assembly elections as also the forthcoming assembly elections in West Bengal.

Denouncing Nadda for his statements, All India Muslim Majlis Mushawarat (AIMMM) president Navaid Hamid said, “If they (BJP) think that there would not be protest if CAA is implemented, they are in big illusion. They would be in great surprise because people would definitely oppose this unconstitutional law”.

Stating that “CAA is itself corona for the country”, he said that the “BJP is an expert in creating divisions and at a time when Covid is still a big challenge for the whole world, hasty decision on CAA will not benefit the country in any way”.

Fr. Cedric Prakash, representing Ahmedabad-based NGO Prashant (Tranquility) said that there is no need of CAA as there are already enough provisions to grant citizenship to people coming from outside and stay in India.  “CAA is discriminatory and divisive and pitting one community against the rest of the country”, he said.

Stating that the “CAA is wrong and the government should listen to the voice of the people of India”, Fr Prakash said that “millions of people had come out on the streets protesting against the whole CAA/NRC and wanted it to be withdrawn in totality”.

Stating that “it was neither a Muslim, Christian or minority issue”, the priest said, “It is about citizenship, sanctity of citizenship of every Indian citizen. And the government of BJP can’t play with citizenship of Indians which is clearly guaranteed and protected by the Constitution”.

Malik Moatasim Khan, Secretary (Community and National Affairs), Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, warned that “people would not accept it if CAA is implemented”.

“Instead of solving problems like increasing unemployment, violence against women, delayed justice in courts and crisis caused by Covid, the government wants to create more problems by announcing to implement CAA”, he stated.

Kolkata-based journalist Abdul Aziz, who is also secretary of the West Bengal unit of AIMMM, said that the statements of Nadda appeared to be politically-motivated and to communalise the voters in the forthcoming assembly elections of West Bengal. He said that BJP wants to use CAA to attract those Hindus who have migrated to India from Bangladesh. “They are not speaking about CAA in Bihar because they feel Nitish Kumar would lose Muslim votes if they do it there”, he said.

- Advertisement -

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

20,000FansLike
3,163FollowersFollow
13,000SubscribersSubscribe

Must Read

UP Panchayat Polls: BJP Suffers Humiliating Defeat; Voters Reject Party Even In Modi’s Constituency

Such is the defeat that the party has received drubbing even in Ayodhya, Mathura and Kashi. Out of 40 district Panchayat seats...

West Bengal: Why Did Muslims Vote En Bloc For Mamata Banerjee?

Syed Khalique Ahmed | India Tomorrow NEW DELHI—The Muslim voters in West Bengal have displayed extreme maturity. Instead of...

MP Religious Freedom Act 2020 Challenged in High Court

Pervez Bari | India Tomorrow BHOPAL—Madhya Pradesh unit of National Confederation of Human Rights Organizations (NCHRO) has challenged the...

Muslim Women’s Right Of Divorce Under Islamic Law: Analysis Of The Recent Judgment Of Kerala High Court

B Mohammed Tahir M. Hakim* The recent judgment of two Judges of the Kerala High Court titled ‘X v....

Related News

UP Panchayat Polls: BJP Suffers Humiliating Defeat; Voters Reject Party Even In Modi’s Constituency

Such is the defeat that the party has received drubbing even in Ayodhya, Mathura and Kashi. Out of 40 district Panchayat seats...

West Bengal: Why Did Muslims Vote En Bloc For Mamata Banerjee?

Syed Khalique Ahmed | India Tomorrow NEW DELHI—The Muslim voters in West Bengal have displayed extreme maturity. Instead of...

MP Religious Freedom Act 2020 Challenged in High Court

Pervez Bari | India Tomorrow BHOPAL—Madhya Pradesh unit of National Confederation of Human Rights Organizations (NCHRO) has challenged the...

Muslim Women’s Right Of Divorce Under Islamic Law: Analysis Of The Recent Judgment Of Kerala High Court

B Mohammed Tahir M. Hakim* The recent judgment of two Judges of the Kerala High Court titled ‘X v....

Is Kumbh Mela Responsible For Current COVID Wave In India?

Akhilesh Tripathi NEW DELHI—Describing Kumbh Mela as a ‘super spreader’ event will not be an understatement. Given the pandemic,...